Wednesday, February 26, 2014

BR#2: Time Flies - Bill Cosby (Novel Summary)

          We can all recall the most famous show in the 1980’s “The Cosby Show,” right?  Since that is the case, when we reminisce on that humorous sitcom, we all with our great minds image that one person who was the main character of the show: Bill Cosby, thus the title.  While he has made television shows, comedies, and films, not many people are aware that he is an author, writing the novel “Times Flies,” the literature of which I am writing a summary and conducting a book talk.
As the plot begins, Bill Cosby first displays his collegiate years at Temple University in the expedition of the novel.  During the rising action, he compares his youthful condition with his current condition, portraying different scenarios like how he used to be able to clear 6’7” on a high jump bar when he now cannot even pass 5’3” and how he used to only consume a quart of milk, bacon, eggs, and steaks daily when he now has to eat foods like fish, skinless chicken, and vegetables, putting lemon juice on the food to give him flavor he craved for when he was a youth.  After his numerous situations defining the rising action, the climax of the novel evolves when he acknowledges the fact that he is old and tries to adjust to his condition.  He exhibits in the novel that his now-deceased son Ennis can outrun him running three-quarters speed while Cosby running seven-eighths speed, becoming aware that he needs to “accept what [he] is and not torture [himself] with visions of what [he] used to be.”  As the action falls, he starts to correct his attitude towards an old man’s perception, exemplifying “as [he has] grown older, [he has] studied people as they approached [the] tarnished years so that… [he] could avoid unfortunate patterns of behavior…”  In result of his experience on aging, Bill Cosby now lives the life of an usual elder, taking extensive naps, devoting an immense amount of his time with his wife Camille, discussing the weather, and refilling his medicine capsules weekly.
In his novel “Time Flies,” Cosby explains his experience on being 50 years old, not young.  He states how aging has affected his life, presenting many different section of his life in the novel and how he has dealt with aging in every circumstance he depicts.  In the section “Can You Dig It” of Chapter 1, Cosby notes, “Suits... don’t go anywhere.  I’m coming back.”  While I laughed as much as I comprehended, Bill Cosby indicates how when he entered his closet at that moment, he saw his sharp, black suit hanging in the closet.  The title of the section, not to mention, serves as a different term compared to the typical meaning; “Can You Dig It” refers to digging a grave, and when Cosby glanced at his suit, his first thought was his age, which linked to his thought of death.  Additionally, in the section of Chapter 2 “I Wonder as I Wander,” Cosby cites, “Roses are red/ my Valiant is blue/ an A1 car/ in row A2.”  Whenever he said this quote, he had to think of a clever way to remember where he parked while at the mall, characterizing how memory loss factors in aging.  Shockingly, Bill Cosby did not even remember that poem when he exited the mall to go home!  Overall, his aging traps him in a stage of delusion on a daily basis while he lives his blessed life.
In summary, while the autobiography deserves a five star rating, the novel outlines Bill Cosby’s life, describing his notable childhood and adulthood eras that triggered in his “nifty-fifty” approach of his life.  He also emphasizes on his trials and tribulations of mid-life: aches and pains, memory and eyesight loss, and slow reflexes that he is witnessing on his adventure of aging.  Generally, aging is not a laughing matter, but with Cosby’s fun-filled charisma and attitude, he makes his experience of aging envious to people, for they cannot deal with aging as calm as Cosby has done.


Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Basketball Compensation: Women v$. Men

“…The salary cap for an entire NBA team… is $58.679 million whereas the salary cap for an entire WNBA team… is $913,000.”  Evidently, Nicole Fourman, the author of this article, depicts how the salaries of the players in the two basketball leagues have an exponential difference.  This statement alone outlines the professional league.  As for the colligate league, “the male head coaches earn $121,815 on average compared to female head coaches, who bring in $81,255.”  Correspondingly, Sarah Tranelli, the news reporter of this topic in The Athens NEWS, describes the salary cap of colligate coaches in terms of males and females.  In consideration with coaches and players, basketball impacts women’s salaries negatively than men’s.
In the first place, female coaches and players sense the discrepancy of their salaries compared to what men are getting paid.  In “Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far Behind That of Men’s Coaches,” the article states, “… the women’s basketball coach, Sylvia Hatchell, earns about one-third of what the men’s coach, Roy Williams, makes each year… Hatchell has won one national title… and Williams has won two.”  While this quote is logical, Hatchell should get paid half of Williams’s salary because of their championship status.  In reality, that dream for women to even make two-thirds as much money as men will never happen because of how women’s salaries are portrayed to those of men’s.  Embedded in the article “Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court,” Tamika Catchings quotes, “…it honestly hasn't been brought to my attention, but it's a true statement…”  Tamika Catchings, arguably one of the best women to play the game of basketball, spoke her mind when she cited that the salary cap for the WNBA needs to rise, presenting the idea on how WNBA players do not stack as much as NBA players do because if the highest-paid WNBA player is somewhat complaining about the pay, then there definitely should be a change.  Her statistics compared with Kevin Garnett, a highly-paid NBA player, Tamika exhibits more honors and credentials, yet she is not as paid as Kevin Garnett.  By the same token, the passage “Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far Behind That of Men’s Coaches” indicates, “…the median salary for [men] coaches [were] $329,300, nearly twice that of [women] coaches… who had a median of $171,600.  Over the past four years, the median pay of men’s… increased by 40 percent compared with the 28 percent [of women’s]…”  Since this quote creates a small amount of confusion, if men are getting paid twice as much than women, why is the percent of increase fairly higher for men than women?  Men are already getting paid more, so why should their salary increase be higher?  On the whole, women typically cannot make more money than men do.  As sad as this epidemic is, I only see one way that women can make more money: wait patiently until a global pay raise showers down from the heavens.
As nearly important to my first claim, the female coaches and players are financially affected by the compensation in the NBA and WNBA.  Portrayed in “Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far Behind That of Men’s Coaches,” the excerpt mentions, “Summitt’s annual compensation of $2.2 million is actually more than that of the men’s coach at Tennessee, Cuonzo Martin, who just finished his first season and earns $1.6 million.”  Even though Cuonzo Martin earns just under $600,000 under Pat Summitt, the veteran coach for the Tennessee Volunteers, he obviously does not display as much experience as Pat Summitt, expressing that he almost breaks even with her financially.  Identically, as Martin continues coaching at Tennessee, he will eventually smoke Pat Summitt simply because he is a man.  In the same fashion, the passage “Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court” specifies, “…Catchings’s career earnings are an estimated $3 million to $4 million, including [endorsements]… and Garnett’s? $291 million, excluding endorsements…”  Mathematically, for every million Catchings produces, Garnett dominates her by a whopping $73 million; while not even considering women in the mix of such money, that type of pay should not be necessary in granting to men.  Provided that his salary is eye-opening, Kevin Garnett not only makes 73 times the amount Catchings earns, but he can literally sit on his couch all day, consuming chips and Cheetos, and gross over twice as much money than Catchings obtains with endorsements alone!  According to the article “WNBA Salaries Are a Reflection of Interest,” Bill Rieber, an economics professor at Butler University, notifies, “the NBA has been in place since 1946; they [have] a 50 year head start over the WNBA and the WNBA is just catching up.”  On one hand, Bill Rieber indicates how men have more of a reason to get paid so much than women do because of all the entertaining dunks and crafty passes they show out on the court.  Even though this is a valid statement, on the other hand, I say that women deserve to obtain more money because they perform the same overall task as the men do: to play the game of basketball.  Given these points, men strictly get paid more than women even if both genders hold the same profession, but in the basketball industry, the amount men receive ridiculously reveals how women’s salaries are jokes compared to men’s.
As can be seen financially, basketball happens to be a flourishing business for both the men and women leagues; the industry also prospers in the colligate level too.  As the years progress, sooner or later, the compensation for women will increase vastly as long as they continue to stay humble.  In simplicity, many societies impact the roles of males and females, yet in this situation, men will always come out on top if the matter is about money; however, if women keep hoping and persevering, they will one day come out on top and start piling paper more than men can even imagine.


Works Cited
Fourman, Nicole. "WNBA Salaries Are a Reflection of Interest." Indianapolis Recorder Newspaper. BLOX Content Management System. 8 Aug. 2013. Web. 31 Jan. 2014.
Gentry, James K., and Raquel M. Alexander. "Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far Behind That of Men’s Coaches." The New York Times. 6 Apr. 2012. Web. 14 Jan. 2014.
Tranelli, Sarah. "Coaches’ Salaries Show Wide Gender Disparity in MAC: It’s All About Money... Or Is It?" The Athens News. The Athens News. 7 Apr. 2013. Web. 10 Feb. 2014.
Woods, David. "Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court." USA Today. 19 May 2012. Web. 12 Jan. 2014.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Current Connection: 3.2

In an ancient article by James K. Gentry and Raquel Meyer Alexander, journalists for The New York Times, entitled “Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far Behind That of Men’s Coaches,” Gentry and Alexander notifies the change in the coaches’ salaries over the years, reasons why the men get paid more than the women, and how the women possibly “get cheated” in their pay compared to the men.

Embedded in the text, Gentry and Alexander wrote, “…the median salary for [men] coaches [during 2010] was $329,300, nearly twice that of [women] coaches… who had a median of $171,600.  Over the past four years, the median pay of men’s… increased by 40 percent compared with the 28 percent [of women’s]…”  The clarity of this quote creates confusion because if the men are getting paid twice as much than the women, why is the percent of increase fairly higher for men than women?  Men are already getting paid more than women, so why should their salary increase be higher?


Pat Summitt and the Lady Volunteers
In reference to the article, Gentry and Alexander noted, “… the vast majority of women’s programs at large universities are not successful financially, while men’s basketball teams are…”  Their minds processing alike, people would rather watch men play basketball than women.  Everybody is aware about that fact!  In this predicament, the quote essentially states that any circumstance involving women will not be worth what men do.



Equally important, Gentry and Alexander declared, “…contracts are often structured so [men] coaches perform more additional duties beyond simply coaching.”  Seriously, what more do the men have to do to get paid two times more than the women?  Even though the quote goes on to say that “the men are required to make 20 appearances a year at alumni events, while the [women are] required to make 15,” the five-appearance difference should not require an immense pay for the men, exemplifying how the women are robbed financially.

Individually, I express a relationship with the article because the men basketball coaches at the junior high theoretically get paid more than the women for the same reasons the article mentioned: they coach football (an additional duty) and they are simply men.  In support of a text, I can allude this passage to an episode of SportsCenter I watched that discussed the salary cap of male and female coaches in the NBA, WNBA, and NCAA.  In a worldwide perspective, no matter if the profession is teaching or medicine, the pay is proportionally the same for men to women, even though doctors get paid much more than teachers.

In summary, women typically cannot make more money than men do.  As sad as this epidemic is, I only see one way that women can make more money: wait patiently until a global raise showers down from the heavens.

  • Absolute Phrase
  • Appositive Phrase
  • Compound Sentence
  • Participle Phrase


Work Cited

Gentry, James K., and Raquel M. Alexander. "Pay for Women’s Basketball Coaches Lags Far                    Behind That of Men’s Coaches." The New York Times. 6 Apr. 2012. Web. 14 Jan. 2014.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Current Connection: 3.1

In an ancient article by David Woods, a columnist for The Indianapolis Star, entitled “Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court,” David Woods reports the feelings of Tamika Catchings, Harvey Catchings, and Kelly Krauskopf on salary caps for the NBA compared to the WNBA.

Kevin Garnett
Shown in the article, Tamika Catchings quoted, “it honestly hasn't been brought to my attention, but it's a true statement…”  In reference, Tamika Catchings, arguably one of the best woman to play the game of basketball, spoke her mind when she stated that the salaries for the WNBA need to rise, presenting the idea on how WNBA players do not stack as much as NBA players because if the highest-paid WNBA basketball player is somewhat complaining about the pay, then there definitely needs to be a change.  Her statistics compared with Kevin Garnett, a highly-paid NBA player, Tamika exhibits more honors and credentials, yet she is not even near the salary of Kevin Garnett.

In the passage, Harvey Catchings, the father of Tamika Catchings, implied that the WNBA “would have been unimaginable 20 years ago…” unlike the “[unimaginable] NBA salaries…”  In brief, he basically specified that NBA salaries are too much and WNBA salaries are too little.  His poor basketball skills still good enough to make an exceptional living, Harvey Catchings, a former NBA player himself, despised the fact that he got paid twice as much than his superstar daughter.

Tamika Catchings
Evidently, Kelly Krauskopf, the C.O.O. of the Indiana Fever, the team Tamika Catchings plays on, mentioned, “…a pretty darn good living [for a four-month season]…”  Opposing the views of Tamika and Harvey Catchings, Kelly Krauskopf considered that compared to an ordinary household, the pay for WNBA players suits a comfortable living.  Krauskopf also inferred that since the development of the league was an elongated period after the development of the NBA, the pay should logically be lower.

Personally, I can create a connection to this article because I have more credentials and experience than my coworkers that were hired after me; however, my coworkers generate more money than I do.  In relation to another text, this article most generally resembles writings involving males and females because of bias situations and stereotypes.  Globally, men truly get paid more than women even if they hold the same profession as women.


All in all, many societies impact the roles of males and females.  In this situation, men will always come out on top if the matter is about money.



  • Absolute Phrase
  • Appositive
  • Compound Sentence
  • Participle


Work Cited

Woods, David. "Equal Pay? Not on the Basketball Court." USA Today. 19 May 2012. Web. 12 Jan.      2014.

Thursday, January 9, 2014

BR#1: A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments - Walter Dean and Christopher Myers

“Together with his younger son Christopher Myers’ strikingly original artwork – employing a different medium for each story – and his older son Chaplain, Captain. Michael Dean Myers’ insightful preface, this abundant family collaboration breathes fresh life into these timeless stories and is a gift to families of all faiths.”  With this quote acknowledging the genius of the novel A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments, Walter Dean and Christopher Myers, father and son of one another, exhibits the true meaning of love throughout the six monumental stories of the Bible in the novel.


In general, what can I say about this book? The novel's theme viewed how I received a different perspective of all six stories portrayed and I connected the six different stories with the meaning of love.  “And it came to pass afterward, that he loved a woman in the valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah… (Judges 16:4) Where you live, I will live.  Your people will be my people, and your God will be my God… (Ruth 1:16)  Compared to the story of Ruth and Naomi, one of the stories in A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments, Samson and Delilah grew to love each other while Ruth and Naomi, daughter and mother-in-law of one another, already had love for each other, exemplifying why the quote from Ruth demonstrated the reaction of what one will do to their loved one.  As these stories completely differ in context, the main theme presented in both stories simply expresses love.  “…for because thou hast done this thing and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son… (Genesis 22:16) …and when he seeth the blood against the lintel and on the two side post, the Lord will pass over the door and will not permit the destroyer to come into your houses to smite you. (Exodus 12:23)  As of these two stories, Zillah and Lot, daughter and father of one another, and Aser and Gamiel, best friends of one another, display love within their stories.  In addition to the stories of Samson and Delilah with Ruth and Naomi, these two stories contrast because of the relationship between the characters, yet the stories all attach with the link of love.  This literature perfectly proves the discrepancies of each story and similarities of love.

Considerably, how does this novel exhilarate me?  The father and son’s style affected my reading of the novel because they illustrated the novel with modern day pictures, although the stories in the novel took place in the biblical era.  On page 18 of A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments, Christopher Myers, the illustrator of the novel, presented a picture of a woman trimming a man’s dreadlocks.  If one pictures Delilah cutting Samson’s hair, one might picture a Renaissance painting of a pleasant woman preparing to snip off a masculine man’s hair.  Since this novel was published in 2003, an extensive time before the biblical era, one will need a more present-day image of Delilah cutting Samson’s hair, exhibiting what Christopher Myers did in the novel.  On page 89 of A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments, Christopher Myers snapped a photo of a standing woman speaking to a sitting, attentive woman.  Even though illustrations in a novel typically show drawings, Christopher Myers decided to bestow his idea of Zillah talking to her mother in a photograph.  This idea that he had of taking a snapshot best portrayed the situation in the story of Zillah and Lot.  His mixture of drawings and photographs attracted my attention of how Christopher Myers desires to express his thoughts in the novel.

Personally, as a lovable human-being, I can relate to this novel because of all the love infused in the literature.  In text, I can compare this novel to Romeo and Juliet because both of these stories ultimately define love between each of the main characters.  Globally, love is the emotion we as people contain with our friends, family, spouse, etc.  Gender roles reflect some of the stories in the novel in a positive way because instead of showing the male and female discrepancies and stereotypes, the novel portrayed the power of love between males and females and how wonderful love is for them.  In the final analysis, Theodore Dreiser states how “[we should] believe in the compelling power of love… [we] do not [have to] understand it. [We should] believe it to be the most fragrant blossom of all this thorny existence.”

In conclusion, I recommend this novel to anybody and everybody, especially the people who enjoy the beautiful stories of the Bible and the stories of love.  Since this novel enhances the way I should, would, and could love, I truly assure that A Time to Love: Stories from the Old Testaments is not only a charming novel, but the literature is also a virtuous lesson of how to love in life.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Literary Analysis - Macbeth

As children, we should all recall the well-known fable The Story of King Midas.  King Midas possessed a grant from the satyr Silenus, a consolidation of a man and a goat, giving him the ability to produce gold by the sense of touch.  Fascinated by his ability, he touched random objects out of pleasure like furniture, documents and clothes.  Later, he became miserable because his dinner transformed into gold after handling his meal.  In result, the King proceeded to bed starved, but he was careless because the more palpable objects he touched, the richer he became.  All of a sudden, when his daughter embraced him, she transformed into gold.  In the final analysis, King Midas pleaded to the god Dionyssus that he did not desire to be wealthy anymore; he simply wished to acquire his daughter back.  Hence, Dionyssus changed all back to reality.  Although the King illustrated minor discrepancies towards Macbeth, the essential lesson of the fable described greedy arbitrations, characterizing the persona of Macbeth in the play Macbeth.  Since the decision of killing astonished Macbeth, he certainly learned from his greed the hard way: death.  In context of death in the play, the grisly arbitrations presented in Macbeth foreshadowed perseverance, humane incessancy, fate, and free will.
Macbeth, the advocate of ambition, became involved with all of the slaughters in every scene of Macbeth, or as one would utter, “the Scottish play.”  During the exposition, the three witches granted Macbeth their prophecy: he will be king.  Overwhelmed with the prophecy, Macbeth plotted to kill King Duncan due to his impatience.  After the murder, Macbeth caused Malcolm and Donalbain to flee from him for safety.  As the climax progressed, Banquo, a dear friend of Macbeth, suspected him of executing Duncan for position.  Immediately, he sent assassins to slay Banquo and Fleance, his son that escaped the catastrophe, because of sovereignty issues.  Meanwhile, Macbeth, his greed of slaughter increasing, also referred more assassins to exterminate the family of Macduff.  Macduff discovered the loss of his family, his grief affecting his arbitrations.  Macduff, his pursuit to kill Macbeth, the man responsible for massacring his family and corrupting Scotland, formed a militia with Malcolm and Siward. Macduff finally confronted Macbeth, and they both fought to their death against each other.  Macduff slew Macbeth, resulting in the crowning of Malcolm, the new King of Scotland.  In consideration, the iniquities of Macbeth instigated him into bottling up his ambitions, clogging up until the bottle exploded into the hands of death.
People persevere… or… life continued despite major conflicts.  In Act 3, Scene 1, lines 5-6 ofMacbeth, Banquo stated, “…but that myself should be the root and father of many kings.”  In brief, Banquo delineated ambition in the quote, for his necessity to rule all of Scotland made him ravenous for perseverance.  His arrogance emitted in the beginning of Act 3 because as he acknowledged the quote, he thought more about becoming king, yearning the throne.  In Act 3, Scene 1, lines 57-58 ofMacbeth, Macbeth noted, “…he hath a wisdom that doth guide his valor to act in safety.”  Macbeth, the main character of the play, indicated how Banquo, a loyal general to the King and Scotland, exhibited suspicion about him killing Duncan to be sovereign.  His perseverance projecting uncontrollably, Banquo became disgusted by the tactics of Macbeth, so his lust caused his effort to overthrow Macbeth.  In Act 3, Scene 1, lines 69-71 of Macbeth, Macbeth cited, “…for Banquo’s issue have I filed my mind.  For them the gracious Duncan have I murdered, put rancors in the vessel of my peace…”  Macbeth, exemplifying remorse towards Duncan, rued slaying him, but Macbeth demanded for his bitterness to diminish his tranquility.  Representing how life continues, Macbeth became aware of his wretched life; therefore, he lazily allowed fate to cope with his life.  Essentially, the theme “people persevere… or… life continues despite major conflicts” portrayed the contradiction between Banquo and Macbeth, respectively.
Fate may be predetermined, but free will determined how people reach their destinies.  As mentioned in the play, Lady Macbeth was disappointed when she “[smelled] the blood still,” but she could not control her situation because “all the perfumes of Arabia [did] not sweeten [her hands]…”  Her free will choosing to commit transgressions, Lady Macbeth depicted her fatality: death.  She decided to be involved with the murders of Duncan and Banquo, so “what [went] around [came] back around” for her.  In Act 5, Scene 8, lines 19-20 of Macbeth, Macduff indicated, “…tell thee, Macduff was from his mother’s womb untimely ripp’d.”  Oddly, Shakespeare suggested that Macduff was a cesarean section baby, causing free will in the perspective of Macbeth because he expressed ignorance about the secret of Macduff and the witches’ prophecy.  His immortality could not be triggered by men born of women, yet Macduff was not born the typical way.  In Act 5, Scene 8, line 69 of Macbeth, Macduff, Malcolm, Siward and their army exclaimed, “Hail, King of Scotland!”  After the duel, Macduff declared Malcolm, the rightful heir to the throne, king.  Malcolm, his fate displaying a promise, became king by default.  By the same token, Malcom coveted slaying Macbeth, his free will bestowing his greed to restore Scotland.  Under those circumstances, the wicked, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth, reaped what they sewed and the blessed, Macduff and Malcolm, popped Champagne for their pain.
Free will stimulated the perpetual nature of life.  In Act 5, Scene 1, lines 60-62 of Macbeth, Lady Macbeth affirmed, “To bed, to bed; there’s knocking at the gate.  Come, come, come, come, give me your hand.  What’s done cannot be undone.  To bed, to bed, to bed.”  Suspecting her daunting distress by her repetition, Lady Macbeth tried to escape from her dilemma by resting, her free will, but she demonstrated ignorance about sleep being the cousin of death.  Lady Macbeth assumingly died sleeping, her death inferred as a suicide later on in Act 5.  She understood that her paranoia monopolized her, so all she could truly hope for in her life was sorrow and persistence due to her cruel misconducts.  In Act 5, Scene 5, lines 52-53 and 57 of Macbeth, Macbeth announced, “If this which he avouches does appear, there is nor flying hence nor tarrying here… at least we’ll die with harness on our back.”  Macbeth summarized free will by his mind-set of no turning back because “[his army would either] stand united or fall divided.”  Despite the outcomes of the battle, Macbeth insisted that life would continue whether if the avenue depicts adventure or appall.  On the whole, even though Lady Macbeth and Macbeth consequently suffered in the play, they accepted the concept of life and its continuity.
Predetermined perseverance decisively generated fate.  In Act 3, Scene 1, lines 156-157 ofMacbeth, Macbeth signified, “It is concluded: Banquo, thy soul’s flight, if it find heaven, must find it out tonight.”  In support of malevolence, Macbeth hired executioners to execute Banquo, displaying his perseverance due to the efficient organization of the crime.  Since he lived a life of murder, Macbeth, his fatality predicting the anticlimactic end of “the Scottish play,” truly died a victim of murder.  In Act 3, Scene 5, lines 28-31 of Macbeth, Hecate, the queen of the witches, clarified, “…as by the strength of their illusion shall draw him on to his confusion.  He shall spurn fate, scorn death, and bear his hopes ‘bove wisdom, grace, and fear.”  Hecate, epitomizing perseverance in granting Macbeth his death certificate, hinted the beguiling witches’ palter towards Macbeth throughout the entire play.  Considering his “immortality,” Macbeth assumed that the witches’ sided with him against Banquo because Banquo perceived to be “lesser than Macbeth…” in the witches’ perspectives.  Consequently, since Macbeth destroyed Banquo, the witches indirectly sought revenge against Macbeth, altering their prophecy to where the fate of Macbeth was death, symbolizing the character of genies and their equivocations.  Overall, the haughtiness of Macbeth hitched him a ride in a Hearse, perceiving how deadly ambition can become in life.                                 
     Ultimately, the analysis of these prominent themes permeated throughout the entire play because death was inevitable in Macbeth.  In Act 1, Scene 5, lines 72-73 and Act 4, Scene 1, lines 168-170 ofMacbeth, Lady Macbeth and Macbeth respectively declared, “…you shall put this night’s great business into my dispatch… his wife, his babes, and all unfortunate souls that trace him in his line.  No boasting like a fool; this deed I’ll do before this purpose cool.”  Lady Macbeth and Macbeth, the dynamic duo of deadly decisions, persevered to kill anybody and everybody that stood in their way of the throne, including the family of Duncan and Macduff.  Comprehending their vicious atrocities, the couple, lusting power and pride, continued their obligation to these crimes, even though Macbeth was sovereign.  In Act 2, Scene 2, lines 46-47 of Macbeth, Macbeth implied, “Sleep no more!  Macbeth doth Murder sleep”—the innocent sleep…”  Generally, Macbeth, a murderer, never slept after his horrific deed because when he forced Duncan into rest (eternally), the spirit of Duncan, along with the spirit of Banquo, surely haunted Macbeth throughout the whole play, screening the bittersweet nature of fatality.  The free will of Macbeth determined to destroy Duncan, the King of Scotland at the time;therefore, Macbeth was destined to repent his misdemeanors because he not only murdered once, but he also committed massacres up to five times in the play!  In summary, death connoted perseverance, humane incessancy, fate, and free will in Macbeth, one of the famous tragedies scripted by Shakespeare.
     In essence, what causes death?  Sure, perseverance, humane incessancy, fate, and free will appear to be satisfying characteristics, but signifying these factors maliciously guides one to a pernicious pathway of foulness, the boulevard Macbeth traveled endlessly.  “As he was valiant, I honour him. But as he was ambitious, I slew him.”  According to Shakespeare, despite the negativity directed towards Macbeth, the former Thane of Glamis and Cawdor, Macbeth happened to be a heroic and faithful soldier to his country and king, yet his prophecy altered his morals, introducing how his name must be edited from “Macbeth” to “Macdeath.”

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Current Connection: 2.1

In a recent article by Ben Brumfield and Dana Ford, news reporters for CNN, the worldwide leader in news, entitled "Lost in the Wilderness: 72-Year-Old Man Survives 19 Days, Eating Lizards, Squirrel," Ben Brumfield and Dana Ford interprets Gene Penaflor's decision when he was lost, in the accident, and rescued.

As stated in the article, Brumfield and Ford notes, "They had split up at their base camp, walking over separate ridges, and were going to meet up down the path a few hours later for lunch. Penaflor never showed."  Concluding from his decision, Penaflor, the 72-year-old man, was not aware of the "consequences" the future bestowed upon him.  He definitely did not desire this predicament to happen, but he sure paid the price for being alone at an anonymous residence.


Evidently, the text quotes, "Instead, Penaflor focused on small game, foraged for algae in a stream and drank water from a creek. To stay dry, he crouched under a fallen tree, and to keep warm, he made a fire and packed dry leaves and grass around his body."  Penaflor, struggl
ing for survival, understood that he was troubled from the situation because after his accident, he was at a disadvantage; he was predictably concussed.  Even though he did not seek luxury in his appetite, his decision to digest the disgusting food aided to his will for survival in the wretched Mendocino National Forest, located in northern California.




Gene Penaflor, 72, was found Saturday after being lost in the Mendocino National Forest in California for 19 days.


In the passage, the article indicates, "A hunter called the sheriff's office in the morning, saying he and his large group of friends could hear a man crying for help from down in a valley."  Penaflor constructed this decision in order to be saved from the wilderness, s
ignalling a siren of help.  In support of his decision-making process, he also chose to do what he could to eat, drink, and most importantly, live!

In my perspective, I perceive my relationship within the article because when I was ten years old,  I was lost during a hiking trip in Boy Scouts.  As related to the text, this passage affiliates to the novel The Swiss Family Robinson because of the will to survive treacherous conditions, depicting the conflict man vs. nature.  In displaying a worldwide view, one must take great knowledge and decision-making to not only survive nature, but to survive humanity.  Uniquely humanity is a link of chains; all of the chains linked together are different by length, size, weight, or color whereas the chains accommodate similarities because all of the chains are chains.


In the final analysis, our decision-making process affects our culture, emotions, and reasoning by the different circumstances life positions us, people, in because Ralph Waldo Emerson conveys, "once [we] make a decision, the universe conspires to make it happen."


  • Appositives
  • Participles
  • Compound Sentence
  • Metaphor


Work Cited

Brumfield, Ben, and Dana Ford. "Lost in the Wilderness: 72-Year-Old Man Survives 19 Days,                     Eating Lizards, Squirrel." CNN. 14 Oct. 2013. Web. 17 Oct. 2013.