Sunday, December 16, 2012

The 3 In 1 Compilation: An Essay, a Test, a Lesson

One of the most important life lessons I acquired from my sixteen years on this planet is how dishonesty cannot save all and foolishness never ages when born.  While these express my two themes, there happens to be much more to the ides than how the idea is displayed.  The themes interact because the consequence of each word can be the same.  In addition, they also build because the more foolish present the more dishonesty forms.  In this case, do not EVER be dishonest and foolish!!!  Why would one consider that an option in life?  To sum up the main point, when deceit and stupidity mingle, the aftermath results in sin.
     
The Crucible may be a well-scripted play, but The Crucible defines a test; the test alludes to the characters, referring to the two themes of the play.  First, John Proctor and Abigail Williams exchanged and distributed lies throughout the play.  Then, she and the Girls committed licentious, idiotic crimes and actions towards the citizens of Salem and towards themselves, too.  Eventually, the play gets crucial around the ending when Proctor determines his prophecy with a suspenseful decision.  Who passes the test of conquering dishonesty and foolishness?  The answer can be simple to evaluate, yet the answer can be hard if one reading this is both dishonest and foolish.

One theme of The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, shows one how dishonesty cannot save all.  In Act I, page 22 of The Crucible, John Proctor, the protagonist of the play, demanded Abigail, “…wipe it out of mind.  We never touched…”  John Proctor cheated on his wife, Elizabeth, with Abigail Williams; he did not want to go to court for lechery.  In fact, Elizabeth was sick and distant from him.  To John, she, “…counted [herself] so plain.”  (Miller 127)  Right after Mr. Proctor told Abby to forget about what they did, she quoted, “aye, but we did.” (Miller 22)  At the same time, Proctor quoted, “aye, but we did not.” (Miller 22)  Next, on page 94, in Act III of The Crucible, Mary Warren, the servant of John and Elizabeth Proctor, confessed, “[she] did…” when Deputy Governor Danforth asked, “…[she] sat in [his] court, callously lying when [she] knew that people would hang by [her] evidence?...”  To point out, Mary Warren did not want to charge murder on Abigail because, “she’ll kill [her] for saying that!” (Miller 76)  Meanwhile, Proctor stated, “[he] will bring [her] guts into her mouth…” if she does not defend him in court. (Miller 76)  In The Crucible, on Act IV, page 129, Rebecca Nurse, the wife of Francis Nurse, affirmed, “…it is a lie… how many [she] damn [herself?]”  After Danforth pleaded “…will you confess yourself, Goody Nurse?”  As an illustration, Deputy Governor Danforth pleaded to Mrs. Nurse twice about admitting to taking part of the conspiracy; he knew she kept on lying about the conspiracy so he adduced, “…[she] surely [saw] it profit nothin’ to keep [the] conspiracy any further.” (Miller 129)  Proctor acknowledged how he contributed himself to the Devil’s service.  When Danforth asked Proctor if he ever saw Rebecca Nurse with the Devil, he said no, lying about Mrs. Nurse seeing the Devil.  On balance, Abu Bakr once said, “the greatest truth is honesty, and the greatest falsehood is dishonesty.”  Stating that dishonesty cannot save all, look at the outcome of John Proctor, Mary Warren, and Rebecca Nurse.

The other theme of The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, shows one how foolishness never ages when born.  In Act I, page 40 and 41 of The Crucible, Abigail Williams, an accuser in the Salem Witch Trials, exclaimed, “[Tituba] made [her] do it!  She made Betty do it… She [made] her drink blood... [send] her spirit on [her] in church… [laughed] at prayers… [dreamed] corruptions…”  Abigail said, “we danced” to the girls. (Miller 19) Significantly, all of the Girls took part of the fiasco.  Henceforth, she told the Girls, “[they] breathed a word, or the edge of a word, about the other thing, [she] [would]…bring a pointy reckoning that would shudder [them].” (Miller 19)  Later, Abby unintelligently threatened the Girls because she did not want any other person to know about their actions.  When Mrs. Putnam entered with Tituba after Reverend Hale interrogated her, she immediately blamed Tituba for the actions they committed and other activities brought upon Abby herself.  Next, on page 70, in Act II of The Crucible, Ezekiel Cheever, a character in the play, uncertainly declared, “why, a poppet --- a poppet may signify--- Now, [Elizabeth] come with me…”  John Proctor asked Mr. Cheever “what [signified] a poppet.”  (Miller 70)  Sooner or later, Cheever started to answer the question, but he intentionally switched topics to save himself from explaining a question he did not know the answer to.  Every time he was asked what a poppet was, he would timidly explain what a poppet was.  At this instant, Cheever went after Elizabeth for his first excuse.  Immediately, he pulled out a needle from the poppet for his second excuse.  Since the needle caught everyone’s attention, Cheever did not have to explain what a poppet was, presenting foolishness in front of everybody.  In The Crucible, on Act III, page 79, Deputy Governor Danforth, a grave man in his sixties, quoted, “do you take it upon yourself to determine what this court shall believe and what it shall set aside?”  As one can see, Danforth said this to Giles Corey.  To elaborate on what Danforth quoted, he basically told Giles that the court can believe whoever they want to believe no matter who was innocent, guilty, right, or wrong rather than the person who happened to be innocent, guilty, right, or wrong.  Under the circumstances, Mr. Corey was not aware that, “… [Salem General Court] is the highest court of the supreme government of [the] province…” (Miller 79)  When Danforth received “disrespect” from Giles Corey, he felt that he had to mention how he belonged in the highest court of the supreme government, hoping that what he stated would intimidate Mr. Corey.  Describing daft situations is Danforth because he felt that since he was a “supreme judge,” he had uncontrollable powers, meaning he can take advantage of anybody and any situation possible.  As can be seen, Alfred Lord Tennysone once said, “sin is too stupid to see beyond itself.”  Specifying how foolishness never ages when born, as soon as foolishness was presented in the play, it never left the play from beginning to end.

One interaction of The Crucible, a play about the Salem Witch Trials, shows one how the consequence of each word can be the same.  In Act IV, page 129 of The Crucible, Rebecca Nurse, a well-respected woman in the community, evilly bellowed to Mr. Proctor, “Oh, John--- God send his mercy on you!”  Shortly, Proctor admitted to what he did, showing honesty; Nurse kept lying, thinking she could get away with the crime.  Certainly, Mrs. Nurse showed stupidity on what she said.  God should not send mercy on Proctor’s soul just because he told the truth!  On page 17, in Act I of The Crucible, Abigail Williams, one of the main characters in the play, commanded, “No, he’ll be comin’ up.  Listen, now; if they be questioning us, tell them we danced--- I told him as much already.  By all means, they did not dance!  First, the Girls baked a witch cake and fed it to a dog.  Second, they made sacrifices and conjured spirits with their base attitudes present, doing more in the woods than anywhere else.  Moreover, the calamity committed got them under deeper waters; Abigail claimed to tell Reverend Parris as much as she could.  Furthermore, the intimation hinted in her quote exhibited her stupidity.  As a result, the more one tells, the more one knows and the closer they get to the truth.  Dealing with two different themes like dishonesty and foolishness can compare and contrast.  For the most part, the way they are expressed in the play created them to display the same result on every character in the drama.
     The other interaction of The Crucible, a play about the Salem Witch Trials, shows one how the more foolishness is present, the more dishonesty forms.  In Act I, page 18 of The Crucible, Abigail Williams, a 17-year-old teenage girl, forcefully said, “Betty, you never say that again! You will never---…”  In brief, Abby committed witchcraft and other deceitful crimes, affecting the people of the city; she presented stupidity because she knew she committed the crimes, so she lied about the crimes.  At that point, Abby lied about drinking blood and not telling Reverend Parris about what happened.  Her “foolishness role” went into effect right then and there.  In the course of time, dishonesty played a role in the situation she happened to be in with Betty.  On page 42, in Act I of The Crucible, Tituba, one of the Girls in the play, blurted, “I don’t compact with no Devil!”  Obviously, Reverend Parris knew that she was lying; he threatened to whip her to death if she did not tell the truth.  Additionally, Tituba told Reverend Hale that she did not mess with the Devil because he accused her of enlisting children to the Devil, expressing dishonesty to him and herself.  During Act IV of the paly, Tituba informed Marshal Herrick how the Devil was a “pleasureman” in Barbados; likewise, he sang and danced there.  Correspondingly, the Devil was also known as “a sweet man” to the people in Barbados, too.  Forming the theme is dishonesty and foolishness.  Given these points, the way the two themes construct among one another creates the play’s atmosphere, making The Crucible a notorious drama.

How do these themes impact the overall drama?  All in all, they impact the overall drama by revealing a little bit of the theme among every character in the play.  Although a couple of characters strongly represented the two themes, the themes permeated the play via characters in small portions to reach out to all of the characters, containing both dishonesty and foolishness in them.  In any event, this impact has been felt throughout history because EVERYBODY has these two thematic characteristics existing in them.  In essence, we all have good and bad characteristics in us; clearly, the bad characteristics are statistically lying and stupidity.  Therefore, today, we should overcome deceit and stupidity.  In conclusion, sin is the product of the combination of deceit and stupidity, emphasizing the negative side of The Crucible.  To take into consideration, one should try their best to surmount the disease of dishonesty and foolishness.  If this does not illustrate any practice, the future will be an abyss in our lives; consequently, we will have a deep, bottomless chasm of lies, idiots, and sins.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

CC#6: Boston Celtics' Chris Wilcox Fined For Flipping Off The Kiss Cam

In a current article by the Los Angeles Times,  entitled "Boston Celtics' Chris Wilcox Fined For Flipping Off The Kiss Cam," the Los Angeles Times narrates 1) why Chris Wilcox did it 2) what the "Kiss Cam" is and 3) the results of his actions.

"Yes, with a sold-out crowd of nearly 18,000 watching, Wilcox greeted the Kiss Cam with his middle finger." Since partners kiss when the Kiss Cam is reflected on them, they expected Chris to kiss his own teammate! He felt anger when the camera reflected onto him, so he reacted to the situation by giving the camera "The Bird."

"...The camera operator finds couples sitting in the stands and puts them on the big video screen, trying to get them to kiss?" The Kiss Cam happens to be a harmless bit many sporting events run between innings or during timeouts.  In consideration of the Kiss cam being annoying, I can see why Chris Wilcox flipped off the camera.

"As a result... Stu Jackson announced Monday that Wilcox has been fined $25,000 for making an obscene gesture directed toward fans during a game." Some people thought he was directing "the message" towards the fans, not the camera. The fans do not control the camera, the cameramen do; therefore, he directed "the message" to them, not the fans.

I can become an active participant in my learning by watching fouls actions committed on TV that are unexpected, not expected like most reality shows.  I can take responsibility for my learning by learning why people react in such a way, leading them into bad news.

The Los Angeles Times narratates how such actions like what Chris Wilcox committed can advance into a lot of trouble.

CC#5: Carmelo Anthony scores 45 Points As Knicks Edge Net

In a current article by the Los Angeles Times, a newspaper published in Los Angeles, California, entitled "Carmelo Anthony scores 45 Points As Knicks Edge Net," the Los Angeles Times narrates 1)  a historical basketball game 2) a great game for Carmelo Anthony and 3) the rivalry between the two teams.

"...Jason Kidd made the tiebreaking three-pointer with 24 seconds left, and the New York Knicks rallied from an early 17-point hole to beat the Brooklyn Nets, 100-97..."  In the NBA, not many basketball games become this crucial.  Usually, teams get beat by a fair amount; in a situation like that, the game is still close, fighting for the win.

"Carmelo Anthony scored a season-high 45 points..."  NBA players rarely score over for 40 points in a game.  Since Carmelo scored 45 points and helped the team rally from a loosing deficit, everybody could agree that Carmelo Anthony had a spectacular game.

"Now the series is tied at 1-1 since the Nets moved to Brooklyn, both games coming down to the tense final minutes."  Both of the teams are New York-based. The New York Knicks and the Brooklyn Nets are basically competing to be the best team in the state..

I can become an active participant in my learning by learning more about history created by individuals like Carmelo and groups like the Knicks. I can take responsibility for my learning by keeping an update on history created by such people that do not intend to create history.

The Los Angeles Times simply narratates how Tuesday's game was special because of the competition and fight these two teams contain.